![]() It would be nice if iLife were accessible, but you are not being forced to pay for that either. Yes, I wish Microsoft Office was accessible, but that is not Apple’s fault, and no one is forced to buy that. Please compare that to what you get for the cost of Windows plus an $800 screen reader. ![]() To be more contrary, without spending extra, you get a decent word processor, web browser, email client, and access to the Unix command line, all for the price of the operating system. The excuses I am willing to allow iTunes do not seem applicable to Pages. I am more troubled by the seemingly arbitrary version numbering escalation than I am with the lack of VoiceOver compatibility. iTunes, since it is linked to iPod and ITMS, is a bread and butter kind of application, so I understand Apple’s reluctance to push the envelope. Pages, on the other hand, is singly platform and only a couple of years old. iTunes has a great deal of legacy code to be surmounted, it is a cross platform application with roots in Classic. To be perfectly honest, however, I am more concerned about Pages 2. I too am disappointed that iTunes continues to be largely inaccessible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |